Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Vogl v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01018
Plaintiff:
Linda Mary Vogl
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2020cv04170
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schouten v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 4:2020cv04123
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joleen Schouten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
South Dakota Board of Regents v. Discount Seeds, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv04115
Defendant:
Discount Seeds, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
South Dakota Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
Kraft v. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency et al
as 4:2020cv04111
Defendant:
Does 1-10, The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes et al v. Hughes County, South Dakota et al
as 3:2020cv03013
Defendant:
Julie Cox, Defendant Does 1-5, Mike Leidholt and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Estes and Estate of Seryl Leroy Pomani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumping Eagle v. Yantis et al
as 5:2020cv05017
Plaintiff:
James S. Jumping Eagle and James Shawn Jumping Eagle
Defendant:
Pennington County Jail Nurses N/F/U, United States Marshals, Pennington County Jail Nurses L/N/U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Evans et al
as 5:2019cv05062
Defendant:
Deputy Matthew Tramp, Harry David Evans, Marty Mechaley and others
Plaintiff:
Shelly Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
East v. Dooley et al
as 4:2019cv04126
Defendant:
LPN Brittany Huber, CO Mastalir, Warden Robert Dooley and others
Plaintiff:
Donald East
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
