Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bane v. United States of America, The
as 2:2017cv03371
Plaintiff:
Ben W Bane
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Mr Pacheco, Adam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyrone Payne v. Louisville Metro Dept of Corr, et al
as 16-6562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE RICHARD PAYNE
Defendant:
LOUISVILLE METRO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER CLINE, OFFICER AARON GREEN and OFFICER DAVID PUCKETT
Cope v. Puckett et al
as 3:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Eli Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
David Puckett, Mark Boltan, Eubanks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON v. PUCKETT et al
as 5:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SINGLETON
Defendant:
DAVID PUCKETT, SONJA KING and NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BRAND v. PUCKETT et al
as 5:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
QUAR'MARDEN Q BRAND
Defendant:
DAVID PUCKETT, ANITA BARNES, OLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puckett et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv03950
Plaintiff:
Stacy Puckett and David Puckett
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puckett et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Stacy Puckett and David Puckett
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUCKETT v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:12-cv-01802
Plaintiff:
DAVID PUCKETT
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
