Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Brooks v. Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv16219
Plaintiff:
Denise Brooks
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, separately and d/b/a Winthrop U.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv04509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KENNEDY v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Defendant:
SAMUEL BEARD, DENISE BROOKS, SCOTT CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HEATH KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PREWITT v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2014cv00061
Defendant:
KEVIN BRANHAM, DENISE BROOKS, RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL L. PREWITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv33383
Plaintiff:
Denise Brooks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2013cv00160
Defendant:
DENISE BROOKS, CLARK COUNTY JAIL NURSES ____ BROOKS AND MIKE _____, CLARK COUNTY JAIL STAFF JOHN DOES/JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raakesh Bhan v. Battle Creek Health System, et al
as 13-1682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAAKESH C. BHAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
BATTLE CREEK HEALTH SYSTEM, TRINITY HEALTH SERVICES, PATRICK GARRETT, Vice President of Trinity Health Services and Former Chief Executive Officer of Battle Creek Health System and others
Brooks v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv10533
Plaintiff:
Denise Brooks
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RHODES v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00024
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, NURSE PRACTITIONER DENISE BROOKS, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
