Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Barnes v. Bartlett, et al.
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Lt. Sheperd, Jakob Goold, Travis Ruby and others
Plaintiff:
John M Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez Cruz v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv10017
Defendant:
Deputy Miller and Director Allen
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. McDonald et al
as 3:2020cv01697
Defendant:
Mr. Kilheeney, Kelly McAndrews, Mary Jo Mather and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick T Ray, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoge v. Korn et al
as 6:2020cv01096
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Hoge, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Head Rick, Deputy Miller and Deputy Korn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Goshen County Detention Center Corporal et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Goshen County Detention Center Lieutenant, Goshen County Detention Center Sergeant Klingsporn, Goshen County Detention Center Sergeant Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dean Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Dart, et al
as 1:2019cv04047
Defendant:
Unknown Deputy 1, Deputy Cusack, Unknown Nurse Assistant and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. State of Vermont et al
as 1:2019cv01479
Defendant:
Deputy Kenyon, Town of Pittsfield, Vermont, Rutland County, Vermont and others
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton Longacre v. Brandon Meyers, et al
as 18-35528
Defendant / Appellee:
KITSAP COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, KURTIS G. LONT, Deputy, KRYSELE DAWN DECLEMENTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAYTON ERNEST LONGACRE
Clayton Longacre v. Brandon Meyers, et al
as 18-35528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAYTON ERNEST LONGACRE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDON L. MEYERS, Deputy, KURTIS G. LONT, Deputy, JASON HEDSTROM, Deputy and others
Anthony Louis Gallo Jr v. Miller et al
as 2:2018cv00008
Defendant:
Deputy Albanese, John Doe No. 1 and OSJ Deputy Miller
Plaintiff:
Anthony Louis Gallo, Jr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
