Cases 11 - 20 of 341
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Berry v. Fedex Freight, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Christopher Deven Berry
Defendant:
Fedex Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hillard et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv06573
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Hillard, Danyel Lacy, Kaycee Suitter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noble v. Napier
as 23-1994
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Hill v. FMC Devens et al
as 1:2023cv12581
Plaintiff:
Raffeal Jerome Hill
Defendant:
FMC Devens and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falcon v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Deven Falcon
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc., Sam's West, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40147
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. FMC Devens et al
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Raffeal Jerome Hill
Defendant:
FMC Devens and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OEHLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33845
Plaintiff:
DEVEN OEHLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
