Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Cox v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2014cv01213
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Donald Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Goodwin v. City of Texas City Texas
as 3:2014cv00090
Defendant:
City of Texas City Texas
Plaintiff:
William Goodwin , Darren Allen , John Thorn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cox v. Dart
as 1:2013cv05874
Plaintiff:
Harold Donald Cox
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deon Gentry v. County of Wayne, et al
as 11-2221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DEON LARON GENTRY
Defendant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF WAYNE, DANIEL J. CARMONA, WARREN EVANS and others
Gentry v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2010cv11714
Defendant:
Wayne County, Daniel J. Carmona, Warren Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Laron Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COX v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88418
Plaintiff:
DONALD COX
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COX et al v. A.P. SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88088
Plaintiff:
DONALD COX
Defendant:
A.P. SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Eugene Loisel, III v. Coxx, et al
as 09-60556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE A. LOISEL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
COXX, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, FAULK and others
Donald Cox v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv04002
Plaintiff:
Donald Cox and Donald Cox
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc, Pacific Capital Bancorp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
