Cases 11 - 20 of 543
Lyon Havlik et al v. University Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv02342
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lyon Havlik, Alice T Lyon and Ross T. Lyon, Individually and as Trustees of the Edward S. Lyon Trust
Defendant:
University Of Chicago, University of Chicago Contributory Retirement Plan, University of Chicago Supplemental Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Edward Baim, et al v. Joel Dukart, et al
as 23-1424
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD S. BAIM, 9970 BUSTLETON LLC, OREGON AVENUE LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOEL DUKART and MICHAEL DUKART
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Im et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Edward S. Im, Sarah Im, Laura Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
STALLINGS v. ENRIQUEZ et al
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STALLINGS
Defendant:
STACY E. ENRIQUEZ, SARAH A. SULKOWSKI, LAURA C. SAYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bopp et al v. Independent Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Patricia S Bopp, Edward S. Bopp, Sydney B. Perez and others
Defendant:
Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Other Insurers Subscribing to Binding Authority B604510568622021 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
Counter Defendant:
Felix Bopp and Contesta Apartments
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Kenneth Brown, et al v. John Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN, Moor Beneficiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST, A Private Moor Aboriginal Virginian National Subject Ambassador At Large and Noble of the Al Moroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN, d/b/a Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, d/b/a Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, et al United States Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Merrick Gardland, et al. Attorney General, et al, United States Heirs and Assignees and others
Debtor / Appellee:
RALPH BREEDEN, III, d/b/a Ralph Breeden III et al d/b/a GA Bar No 195892 attorney at law Hayt, Hayt & Landau, P.L. Heirs and Assignees
BROWN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN D/B/A ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE, JANET LOUISE YELLEN d/b/a JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, MERRICK GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Blinken
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore benefiiciary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore beneficiary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, United States, Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, United States, Heirs & Assignees, Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, SSA, Heirs & Assignees and others
Brown v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv09205
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Anderson Brown
Defendant:
Antony John Blinken, Janet Louise Yellen, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Christopher Harbridge v. Reed, et al
as 22-55861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
REED, Captain in Charge of Facility-C, CSP-LAC
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GRAY DAVIS, JAMES E. TILTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
