Cases 11 - 20 of 29
HALL v. HARTMAN et al
as 2:2020cv03235
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JOSEPH CREMEN and DETECTIVE TIMOTHY HARTMAN
Plaintiff:
EARL HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Jeffery Hall
as 17-5222
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFERY EARL HALL
Hall v. Fox
as 2:2016cv02628
Petitioner:
James Earl Hall
Respondent:
Robert Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jimmy Hall v. Carter Davenport, et al
as 16-16611
Petitioner - Appellant:
JIMMY EARL HALL
Respondent - Appellee:
CARTER DAVENPORT and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Fuchs et al v. New York City District Council of Carpenters' Pension Fund and New York City District Council of Carpenters' Welfare Fund
as 1:2013mc00307
Plaintiff:
John Fuchs , Earl Hall , Lloyd Martin and others
Defendant:
New York City District Council of Carpenters' Pension Fund and New York City District Council of Carpenters' Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Hall v. Davenport, et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Earl Hall
Defendant:
Carter Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv01383
Plaintiff:
EARL HALL
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delollis et al v. Fuchs et al
as 2:2012cv02331
Plaintiff:
John Delollis, Tom Holsman, Douglas McCarron and others
Defendant:
John Fuchs, Earl Hall, Lloyd Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THI of South Carolina v. Deborah Wiggin
as 11-2397
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA, LLC, d/b/a Magnolia Manor of Columbia
Defendant - Appellant:
DEBORAH J. WIGGINS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Earl Hall
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
