Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Charles Nance v. City of West Point, et al
as 20-60328
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE EVE, CITY OF WEST POINT, TERRY SCOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES NANCE
Nance v. Kitchens et al
as 1:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Remiriz Doe, Larry Edwards, The County of Clay and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Guines v. Clay County et al
as 1:2019cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Guines
Defendant:
Clay County, Eddie Scott, City of West Point and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nance v. City of West Point, et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Defendant:
City of West Point, Hoodie Lee, Eddie Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Clay County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rachel Harris
Defendant:
Forrest Allgood, Honorable Lee Howard, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Whitefoot, et al v. Sheriff of Clay County, et al
as 18-60476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WHITEFOOT and ELENA R. WHITEFOOT
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE SCOTT, Sheriff of Clay County in individual and official capacity in second incident and also as Chief Deputy in first incident, BRAD PETTIT, Clay Deputy Sheriffs in individual and official capacities, FRANK WILLIAMSON, Clay Deputy Sheriffs in individual and official capacities and others
Calvin Cannady v. Clay County Mississippi, et al
as 17-60843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN CANNADY
Defendant - Appellee:
CLAY COUNTY MISSISSIPPI and SHERIFF EDDIE SCOTT
Scott v. Anthony
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Eddie Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Alisa Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Anthony
as 4:2017cv00670
Plaintiff:
Eddie Scott, Jr
Defendant:
Alisa Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
