Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Jordan v. Bloomington Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv01154
Defendant:
Kevin Raisbeck, Bloomington Police Department and Jared Bierbaum
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3098
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jordan v. Windsor et al
as 3:2017cv00427
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Defendant:
Town of Windsor , Kelvan Kearse , Thomas Lappore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 11-1595
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL, GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC., SUSAN DUDLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AETNA, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LaCourse v Sibley Limestone, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv14344
Defendant:
Detroit Asphalt Paving Co., Allan Young, Ajax Materials Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
David LaCourse and United States of America
Jordan v. Standley et al
as 3:2012cv03242
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Defendant:
Kevin Standley, Alex Dawson, Raymon Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Jordan v. Ken Clark
as 12-55398
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK
Jordan v. Godinez et al
as 3:2011cv03437
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Defendant:
Salvador A Godinez and Terry Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Jordan v. Ken Clark
as 11-57051
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JORDAN
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
