Cases 11 - 20 of 2,183
Ellison v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Defendant:
Officer Metcalf and Daniel Davis
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt A. Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AbbVie, Inc. et al v. Ellison
as 0:2024cv02605
Plaintiff:
Allergan Sales, LLC, AbbVie Products LLC, Pharmacyclics LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Minnesota Hospital Association
Defendant:
Keith M. Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sibanda v. Ellison et al
as 1:2024cv06310
Defendant:
David Ellison, FOSUN PICTURES INC, Ashlee Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Attorney Kissinger N Sibanda
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rowell v. Howard et al
as 0:2024cv03326
Defendant:
Ramsey County DHS, Keith Ellison and Pamela Howard
Plaintiff:
Bruce Roberts Rowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv02548
Respondent:
Keith Ellison and State of Minnesota
Petitioner:
Andrew Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellison (PS) v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2024cv02229
Defendant:
Barry Finck, Jefferson County, Diego Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Demorris Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Ellison v. IH3 Property West LP et al
as 2:2024cv06647
Defendant:
Mackenzie Gonzales, Chris Evans, Deputy Sheriff Galvan and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yussef v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 0:2024cv02721
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and Keith Ellison
Plaintiff:
Abdulrazak Yussef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pelko v. Nueces County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00172
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Garcia, Correctional Officer Vargas, Correctional Officer White and others
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pelko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
