Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12260
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Neves-Knight et al v. BRM Home Health, PLLC et al
as 1:2018cv00201
Defendant:
Rodney Mesquias, Merida Health Care Group, Inc., Jose Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Miles, Nita Hilburn, Nichole Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Pena
as 2:2017mj30506
Defendant:
Francisco Pena
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Pena
as 2:2017mj30506
Defendant:
Francisco Pena
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Francisco Pena-Zavala
as 13-20723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO ANTONIO PENA-ZAVALA, also known as Francisco Antonio Pena Zavala, also known as manuel Duarte, also known as Francisco Antonio Dena-Zavala, also known as Francisco A. Pena Z, also known as Francisco Pena, also known as Milton Santiago Pena
Pena-Rosales v. United States Of America DO NOT DOCKET. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN CRIMINAL CASE #2:11cr1143-1.
as 2:2013cv00315
Petitioner:
Francisco Pena-Rosales
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 7:2013cv00255
Defendant:
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company , Insurance Claims Adjusters, Inc. (ICA) , Jim Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Pena , Marissa Pena and Mariztel Pena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Pena Santiago v. Holder
as 13-1773
Petitioner:
Juan Francisco Pena Santiago
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
US v. Pena-Pimental
as 12-2319
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO PENA-PIMENTAL, a/k/a John Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
