Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Young v. Cownie
as 4:2020cv00338
Defendant:
Frank Cownie
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2020cv00273
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dennis McMahon and Sara Jill Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Waller, Thomas Hicks, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Adams
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leveke v. Sarcone et al
as 4:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Cody Ray Leveke and Cody Ray Meyers
Defendant:
Jaki Livingston, John Sarcone, Polk County Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Brent Appel, Paul Macek and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant, Kenneth Tennant, Kenneth C. Tennant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hansen's Inc v. Frank et al.
as 5:2019cv04069
Defendant:
Tidepool Media, Inc, Timothy Frank, Matthew Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Hansen's Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarado v. Gardner et al
as 1:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Pete Wilson, Nurse Kelly, Dr. Broksek and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Salvador Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv01014
Plaintiff:
Frank S Gibbs
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley v. Newton Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2019cv00170
Defendant:
Newton Correctional Facility, Kristen Anderson and Sean Crawford
Plaintiff:
Frank W. Stanley and Frank W. Stanley, Sr.
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darling et al v. Boecker et al
as 1:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Justin Boecker, City of Cedar Rapids, Jerry A Vander Sanden and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Massingham, Brian Darling and Brian Hutchcroft-Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
