Cases 11 - 20 of 40
DUNCAN v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv00544
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER G DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duncan v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09472
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Spivey v. Wilson et al
as 5:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Spivey
Defendant:
Jordan Wilson, Francisco J Facio, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Qassis et al v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis Hospitals d/b/a Methodist Hospital and Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
as 2:2016cv02520
Defendant:
Methodist Healthcare Memphis Hospitals
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Qassis , Dayna Webster , Lillian Knox-Bender and others
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sirica Bumpus v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 15-11846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIRICA BUMPUS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, administrator for national inmate appeals, G. DUNCAN, a unit manager, WARDEN and others
Bumpus v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Sirica Bumpus
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, G. Duncan, Loren Grayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duncan v. Santos et al
as 3:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
Donald G Duncan
Defendant:
Venerio M Santos, Lisa Krebs, Christine Kracht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v. Duncan
as 11-2745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiang Li
Defendant - Appellee:
John G. Duncan, Executive Assistant United States Attorney in Syracuse NY, Craig Armstrong Benedict, Assistant United States Attorney and United States Attorney's Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
