Cases 11 - 20 of 249
Fox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox, Thomas Elsberry, William English and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Rodvelt
as 23-4182
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY LEE RODVELT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Miller v. SSA
as 5:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
King D'Arezzo v. Swanson et al
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee King D'Arezzo
Defendant:
Kathy Swanson and Wyoming Community Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Benefield v. Elliott et al
as 6:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Denise Benefield
Defendant:
Johnny Bruce Elliott, Gregory Lee Anderson, Oprah Winfrey Network and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Benefield v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Denise Benefield
Defendant:
Gregory Lee Anderson, Floyd Washington, Vincent Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shields v. McKenzie
as 1:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Gregory Lee Shields, Sr.
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
