Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Smith v. NSA et al
as 1:2016cv09916
Plaintiff:
Regina Marie Smith
Defendant:
NSA, Gloria Wood, Mitch Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meghan Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05644
Plaintiff:
Meghan Aguilar, Teddy Amstone, Sang An and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Woods v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv02813
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Gloria Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
MITCHELL et al v. W2005 WYN HOTELS LP
as 4:2012cv00425
Plaintiff:
JANEENE MITCHELL , TANISHA HALL , SHEYVONNE FREEMAN and others
Defendant:
W2005 WYN HOTELS LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WOOD et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv65072
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. WOOD and GLORIA WOOD
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armwood et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08637
Plaintiff:
Reggie Armwood, Reggie Armwood, Roland Bradley and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Wilson v. C. G. Wood Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv02751
Plaintiff:
Leona Wilson and Leona Wilson
Defendant:
C. G. Wood Company, Inc., Clifton G. Wood and Gloria Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
