Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Metz v. Sterling et al
as 8:2020cv01453
Plaintiff:
George Douglas Metz, II
Defendant:
Charlotte County Govenment, Randall Sterling and Charlotte County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Metz v. Sterling et al
as 2:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
George Douglas Metz, II
Defendant:
Charlotte County Govenment and Randall Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robin Hood Who v. U.S. Dept. of the Treasury
as 19-35723
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBIN HOOD WHO, on behalf of all victims of such a "Abomination Govenment"
Pruitt v. Etowah Sheriffs Dept et al
as 1:2018cv03551
Plaintiff:
Leslie Sean Pruitt
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriffs Dept, Etowah Sheriffs Dept and Georgia Govener Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2017cv02390
Plaintiff:
Stella Dawn Mendoza and Manuel Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Donald John Trump, Melania Trump, Ivanka Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Beall, Jr.
Defendant:
Govener Lawrance Hogan, 2 East Staff, Paul Vince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bechtold v. Hogan et al
as 8:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Bechtold
Defendant:
Govener Lawrance Hogan, Director Robinson, Tom Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-41716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
