Cases 11 - 20 of 951
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ESTATE OF KAREN CHURCHILL et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05506
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KAREN CHURCHILL and MAURY HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. M. Lopez et al
as 5:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
M Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company v. Kaelyn Marie Hairston et al
as 2:2024cv02011
Plaintiff:
Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Kaelyn Marie Hairston, Larvanda D. Hairston, aka Lavonda Hairston, Charisa A. Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hairston v. Lopez et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
M. Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Courtney Smith, et al
as 24-5035
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney L. Smith, Kenneth M. Carpenter, Amanda L. Meredith, Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hairston v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hairston
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Oliver v. State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Eddie Van Oliver, III
Defendant:
State Of Ohio, Lawerence Hairston and Eddie Van Oliver, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
