Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 245
Local 509 of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Senior Aerospace SSP
as 2:2023cv06734
Petitioner: Local 509 of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Respondent: Senior Aerospace SSP doing business as Senior Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Baltrusaitis et al v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10861
Plaintiff: Thomas Baltrusaitis, Guillermo Antunez, Patrick Barth and others
Defendant: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, FCA US, LLC, f/k/a Chrysler Group LLC, Alphons Iacobelli and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA - UAW LOCAL 1612 et al v. INEOS COMPOSITES US LLC
as 2:2022cv04884
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA - UAW LOCAL 1612 and INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW
Defendant: INEOS COMPOSITES US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al v. DAP Global, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and UAW Local 888
Defendant: DAP Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Mancilla et al v. Barofsky (Monitor) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv12443
Plaintiff: Brandon Mancilla and Alexandra Vail Kohnert-Yount
Defendant: Neil M. Barofsky (Monitor) and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. UAW We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1943
Plaintiff / Appellant: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
Defendant / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1781
President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al Featured Case
as 1:2020cv11283
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff: President and Fellows of Harvard College and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Amicus Curiae: LinkedIn Corp., Dropbox, Inc., The Catholic University of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bell Textron Inc. v. United Local 218, U.A.W. et al
as 4:2022cv00884
Plaintiff: Bell Textron Inc.
Defendant: United Local 218, U.A.W. and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
as 22-1480
Petitioner: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
International Union, (UAW) v. National Labor Relations Board
as 09/1:22-CA-01480
Plaintiff: International Union, (UAW)
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board
Petitioner: International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?