Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Hamlett v. Everly et al
as 7:2021cv06663
Plaintiff:
John Hamlett
Defendant:
C.O. Taj K. Everly, C.O. Christopher J. Dillon, C.O. Gary J. Perrotta, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILLON v. MCCARTHY
as 1:2021cv02124
Petitioner:
SEAN J. DILLON
Respondent:
RYAN MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAYES v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Defendant:
MATLOCK, T. TURNER, M. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kolle v. Kyle et al
as 2:2021cv00984
Defendant:
Deborah Priece, J. Dillon, Larry McGarvey and others
Plaintiff:
John LaMar Kolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2020cv02319
Defendant:
Mr. Kutz, Mrs. Bonnie Holley, Mrs. Laurer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon et al v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC) et al
as 2:2020cv01436
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Dillon and Robert J. Dillon
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC), M. Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon et al v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC) et al
as 2:2020cv01475
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Dillon and Marvin L Dillon
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Warden Brian Koehn, M. Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2019cv01368
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dillon v. DXC Technology Services, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13315
Defendant:
DXC Technology Services, LLC and Anurahda Balasubramaniam
Plaintiff:
Paul J Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dillon v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03130
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.