Cases 11 - 20 of 123
HOLMES v. JOHN DOE, et al
as 2:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
UNKNOWN, PITTSBURG PORT AUTHORITY and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Holmes v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes, III
Defendant:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2022cv00919
Petitioner:
Henry James Holmes, III
Respondent:
Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vicky Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster, Karen Frye and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Henry James Holmes v. Robert Forman et al
as 5:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes
Defendant:
Robert Forman, B. Smith, D. Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster, Karen Frye and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Peacock v. First Order Pizza, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02315
Plaintiff:
Samuel Peacock
Defendant:
First Order Pizza, LLC, Ty Turner, James Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00814
Plaintiff:
Forrest, Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Henry Holmes v. Theresa Cisneros
as 22-55589
Petitioner / Appellant:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Respondent / Appellee:
THERESA CISNEROS, Acting Warden for Corcoran Treatment Facility Prison
HOLMES v. VEITH et al
as 2:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL VEITH, JOSE MANUEL CARVALLO, JR., ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
