Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 0:2023cv61575
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Justin Johnson v. Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
as 23-6753
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN JERMAINE JOHNSON, a/k/a Justin J. Johnson
Respondent:
WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
JOHNSON et al v. QUADRI
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE JOHNSON and SECOYA ROBINSON
Defendant:
PAMELA QUADRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cross v. Johnson et al
as 0:2023cv60393
Plaintiff:
Mr. Demetrius Cross
Defendant:
Jermaine Johnson and Sheriff Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Marlon Johnson
as 22-6048
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARLON JERMAINE JOHNSON
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22348
Plaintiff:
JEREMY JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Hughes
as 3:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2022cv03210
Petitioner:
Justin Jermaine Johnson and Justin J. Johnson
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Freeman et al
as 7:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Leon Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
A. Freeman, J. Shephard, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargasan v. MG Freesites, LTD et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bruce Vargasan
Defendant:
MG Freesites, LTD doing business as Pornhub.com, Mindgeek USA, Inc., Briget Renee Aussin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
