Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Silverio Raymundo-Contreras v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-4082
Petitioner:
SILVERIO DE JESUS RAYMUNDO-CONTRERAS
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General
Contreras v. USA
as 1:2016cv00074
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jesus M. Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AYBAR et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv01539
Plaintiff:
CARMEN JOSEFINA CONTRE AYBAR and DARIO DE JESUS MORETA CONTRERA
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and LAURA ZUCHOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Jose Contreras v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 15-50771
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Jesus Monreal Contreras
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stephens, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jose Contreras v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50771
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE JESUS MONREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Monreal Contreras v. Stephens
as 5:2015cv00542
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Monreal Contreras
Respondent:
William Director Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monreal Contreras v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00020
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Monreal Contreras
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv00686
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Jesus Eduardo Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Velasco-Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73646
Petitioner:
ANTONIO VELASCO-GOMEZ, AKA Jesus Aranda Contreras, AKA Antonio Gomez Velasco
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Felipe Rodriguez-Contreras v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73594
Petitioner:
FELIPE DE JESUS RODRIGUEZ-CONTRERAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
