Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Neva Ciftcioglu v. Bulova Technologies Grp, Inc., et al
as 12-20039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEVA CIFTCIOGLU, Doctor
Defendant - Appellant:
BULOVA TECH LABS, INCORPORATED, GROWTH TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and JOHN STANTON
Neva Ciftcioglu v. Bulova Technologies Grp, Inc.
as 12-20039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Neva Ciftcioglu, Doctor
Defendant / Appellant:
Growth Technologies International, Incorporated, Bulova Tech Labs, Incorporated and John Stanton
Rogers et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2011cv00620
Plaintiff:
Stacy Rogers , Sean Adams , Reuben T. Albright and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
STANTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
as 1:2011cv00613
Plaintiff:
JOHN STANTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANTON et al v. GREENSTAR RECYCLED HOLDINGS, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2010cv05658
Plaintiff:
JOHN STANTON and HARV STRAUS
Defendant:
GREENSTAR RECYCLED HOLDINGS, L.L.C. and GREENSTAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ciftcioglu v. Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02826
Plaintiff:
Neva Ciftcioglu
Defendant:
Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. , Bulova Tech Labs, Inc. , Growth Technologies International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANTON v. REUKAUF
as 1:2010cv00633
Plaintiff:
JOHN STANTON
Defendant:
WILLIAM REUKAUF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodman Ball, Inc. et al v. Mach II Aviation, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv01249
Plaintiff:
Goodman Ball, Inc. and Peter Arger
Defendant:
Mach II Aviation, Inc., Escape Velocity of Tampa Bay, Inc., John Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Moredock v. Moredock et al
as 1:2008cv01226
Plaintiff:
Paul Douglas Moredock
Defendant:
Robert Brian Moredock, David Edward Moredock, John Stanton Moredock and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
