Cases 11 - 20 of 165
Jose Chavez-Gutierrez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-11513
Petitioner:
JOSE EDUARDO CHAVEZ-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11948
Plaintiff:
Jose A Chavez
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley Walker v. Wellpath
as 23-6102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY WAYNE WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, DR. JOSE J. CHAVEZ and NURSE PRACTITIONER BETH ROUSE
Defendant:
LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, LEXINGTON COUNTY, V. BOOKMAN, Classification Correctional Officer and others
RODRIGUEZ-CHAVEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv07343
Petitioner:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ-CHAVEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chavez v. USA
as 4:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Chavez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chavez-Flamenco v. Garland
as 22-1877
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO CHAVEZ-FLAMENCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust v. Chavez et al
as 5:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust
Defendant:
Jose Jesus Chavez, Jr and Cherie Marie Chavez-Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chavez-Dominguez v. Garland
as 22-60567
Petitioner:
Jose Oscar Chavez-Dominguez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14652
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL CHAVEZ and JOSE MANUEL CHAVEZ, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
