Cases 11 - 20 of 425
Jaquez v. Mandel et al
as 1:2023cv09342
Plaintiff:
Leandro Jaquez
Defendant:
PO Sean W Mandel, PO John A. Magee, PO Juan Carlos Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv08404
Plaintiff:
Felix Jaquez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JAQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20530
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JAQUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Journigan v. Deputy D. Jaquez
as 4:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Duane Journigan
Defendant:
Deputy D. Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Jaquez-Diaz
as 23-1762
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMON JAQUEZ-DIAZ, a/k/a Ramon Jacquez-Diaz
Wagner et al v. Harris County, Texas
as 4:2023cv02886
Plaintiff:
Octevia Wagner, Gabrielle Smith, Dwanna Johnson and others
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stang v. Jaquez
as 3:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Joe Dee Stang
Respondent:
Israeli Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jaquez v. Schrum et al
as 6:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Chris Schrum, Johnny Dallis, Sylvia Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Jaquez
as 3:2023cv00987
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Beltran
Respondent:
Warden Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran v. Warden Jaquez
as 4:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
Anthony Joseph Beltran
Respondent:
Warden Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
