Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Clark v. Unknown
as 4:2017cv00171
Petitioner:
Jerry Clark, Sr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Natrona County Detention Center Administrator et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Zachariah L Johnson
Defendant:
Natrona County Detention Center Administrator, Jerry Clark, Natrona County Sheriff's Department Former Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. USA
as 1:2016cv01647
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jerry Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cooper v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2016cv02305
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Clark
as 15-8135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY CLARK, Natrona County Sheriff's Department Deputy Lieutenant and NATRONA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DEPUTY LIEUTENANT
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2015cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jerry Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Clark
as 15-8088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY CLARK, Natrona County Sheriff's Department Deputy Lieutenant
Tolliver et al v. Clark
as 5:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Kyaleah LaCameron Tolliver, Daron Thurmond and Lynnedward L Tolliver
Defendant:
Jerry Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgeview Health Care Center, v. Jerry Clark
as 15-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGEVIEW HEALTH CARE CENTER, LTD., an Illinois corporation, indvidually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY CLARK, doing business as Affordable Digital Hearing
Cooper v. Clark et al
as 1:2015cv00164
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Jerry Clark, David - Patterson, Buddy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
