Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Blonstein v. GGP, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00679
Plaintiff:
Justin Blonstein
Defendant:
Sandeep Mathrani, Janice R. Fukakusa, Daniel B. Hurwitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mehra v. Ennis et al
as 1:2018cv00021
Defendant:
Alphabet Merger Sub, Inc., Amplify Snack Brands, Inc., Jeffrey S. Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Anup Mehra
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rubin v. Amplify Snack Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00014
Defendant:
Amplify Snack Brands, Inc., Jeffrey S. Barber, William David Christ II and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In re Willis Towers Watson plc Proxy Litigation
as 1:2017cv01338
Defendant:
Willis Group Holding plc, Valueact Capital Management, Jeffrey W. Ubben and others
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Retirement System
Petitioner:
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council as the Administering Authority of Greater Manchester Pension Fund, Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. and Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Haley v. Calcasieu Parish et al
as 2:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
John M Haley
Defendant:
Sheriff of Calcasieu Parish and Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Calcasieu et al
as 2:2012cv02548
Plaintiff:
John M Haley
Defendant:
Parish of Calcasieu, Tony Mancuso, Boling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. John Haley
as 10-30290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN BENJAMIN HALEY
Haley v. Acklin et al
as 5:2010cv00571
Plaintiff:
John Benjamin Haley
Defendant:
Brenda Acklin, Jerry Goodwin and Jimmie Leblanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
