Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Martin v. Driskell
as 21-40296
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU LNU, Warden Driskell, Supervisor Unknown and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Martin
John Armstrong, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-15614
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIE JOHNSON, JAMES AMAURIC, GREGORY SANDOVAL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01308
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Armstrong v. Isuzu Motors Limited, et al
as 21-15045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARMSTRONG, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED, a Japanese corporation
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Everson v. Lantz
as 21-17
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Corrections, Robert Carbone, John Armstrong and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Daniel Everson
John Armstrong, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-16921
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIE JOHNSON, JAMES AMAURIC, GREGORY SANDOVAL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00284
Defendant:
Isuzu Motors Limited and General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
John Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clay v. Collier et al
as 3:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, John Armstrong, Kristenna Shipman and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Driskell et al
as 6:2019cv00311
Defendant:
Warden Driskell, Mrs. FNU Pearson, Elgene Mainus and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
