Cases 11 - 20 of 20
BEHRENS et al v. USA
as 1:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. BEHRENS , ARLINE M. BEHRENS , MANUEL D. DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. John Smith
as 15-1901
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. SMITH, also known as DOPE BOY
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2015cv02196
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. John Smith
as 14-2661
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. SMITH, also known as DOPE BOY
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Smith v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
John M. Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Breedlove v. CRST International, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv21817
Plaintiff:
Juanita Breedlove
Defendant:
CRST International, Inc., John M Smith, CRST Van Expedited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Modern Age Builders, Inc. et al v. City of Joplin, Missouri
as 3:2009cv05105
Plaintiff:
Modern Age Builders, Inc. and John M. Smith
Defendant:
City of Joplin, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Gosmile, Inc.
as 8:2009cv02849
Plaintiff:
John M Smith
Defendant:
Gosmile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
John M. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
