Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oparaji v. Home Retention Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv02758
Defendant:
Jordan Smith, Akerman LLP, Home Retention Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Oparaji
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Quinones-Pimentel et al v. Cannon et al
as 3:2020cv01443
Plaintiff:
Kiaras, LLC, NAICOM DATA CENTER, NAICOM CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
KEVIN GEDEON, BRAD REX, CELIA MAHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26508
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JORDAN SMITH SR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Return Disposal, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jordan Smith
Defendant:
Return Disposal, LLC and Toben Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mallwitz v. Mack et al
as 2:2020cv02220
Defendant:
Scarlet Wilson, Det D.J. Pritchard, Benjamin Andrew Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Mallwitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18246
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JORDAN SMITH SR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08954
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Stephan et al
as 4:2019cv02742
Defendant:
Brandi Lathan, Sherman L. Anderson, Michael Stephan and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Jordan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
