Cases 11 - 20 of 290
Butler County Board of Commissioners v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45037
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Butler County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Varela v. K Mart Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv12281
Plaintiff:
Antonio Varela
Defendant:
K Mart Corporation and Gator Fairhaven Partners, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gifford v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv02673
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gifford
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation and Gendron, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harold Owen v. K-Mart Corporation
as 17-2165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD OWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
K-MART CORPORATION
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv03657
Plaintiff:
One World Technologies, Inc. and K Mart Corporation
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Olsen-Ivie et al v. K-Mart et al
as 2:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
Tamra Olsen-Ivie , Samantha Olsen and David Olsen
Defendant:
K-Mart and Sears Holding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dean et al v. K Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv14043
Plaintiff:
Joann Dean and James Dean
Defendant:
K MART CORPORATION , Sears Holding Management Corporation and ERMC OF AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. K-Mart Corporation
as 5:2016cv01485
Plaintiff:
Evon Allen
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graves v. K-Mart Corporation
as 5:2016cv01483
Plaintiff:
Tracy Graves
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. K-Mart Corporation
as 2:2016cv06782
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation
Plaintiff:
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd, The Regents of the University of California, Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
