Cases 11 - 20 of 235
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
J. Thompson, M. Ledoux, J. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Keith William Sullivan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Washoe County District Attorney, Deputy D.A. Kevin Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sullivan v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Keith William Sullivan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Washoe County District Attorney, Deputy D.A. Kevin Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Prummell et al
as 2:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, CPI Buckinsky, C. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Keith Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sullivan v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Keith William Sullivan
Defendant:
Steven Sisolak, Joseph Lombardo, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byron WilliamsIn re: Byron Williams
as 23-1575
Petitioner:
In re: BYRON KEITH WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BARBRA STOREY, Acting Warden
Williams v. Wainstein et al
as 8:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Wainstein, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02011
Petitioner:
Brandon Keith Williams
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
