Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Troell et al v. Binance Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2024cv07136
Plaintiff:
A.W., L.S.C., L.M.C. and others
Defendant:
Binance Holdings Limited doing business as Binance doing business as Binance.com and Changpeng Zhao
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Foremost Insurance Company v. Haynes et al
as 2:2024cv00528
Defendant:
Esther Haynes and Kenneth Lewis
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aigbekaen v. Warden
as 24-2144
Defendant:
WARDEN, FCI Danbury, Mr. BATISTA, CO, GILLEPSIE, Lt. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Talley v. Mumford et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Gerald Mumford, Judge Kenneth Lewis, Judge Johnnie McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc. and Doe Contractor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Aigbekaen v. Gillepsie
as 24-428
Defendant:
WARDEN, WARDEN, FCI Danbury, GILLEPSIE, Lt., DURANT, Lt. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Lewis et al v. JJP Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis, Ryan Bradford, Michael F. Rhymes and others
Defendant:
JJP Trucking, Inc. and Breanna Buckner
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19043
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15158
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aigbekaen v. Warden
as 23-388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raymond I. Aigbekaen
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden, FCI Danbury, McGregor, Lt., S.I.S, Gillepsie, Lt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
