Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 55
North Carolina Green Party v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 22-1830
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA GREEN PARTY, TONY NDEGE, MATTHEW HOH and others
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CHAIR DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as a member or employee of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member or employee of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
North Carolina Green Party et al v. North Carolina State Board of Elections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00276
Plaintiff: North Carolina Green Party, Tony Ndege, Matthew Hoh and others
Defendant: North Carolina State Board of Elections, Chair Damon Circosta, Stella Anderson and others
Intervenor Defendant: DSCC and North Carolina Democratic Party
Amicus Curiae: National Republican Senatorial Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bell v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00495
Plaintiff: Karen B. Bell
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Madison Cawthorn v. Barbara Lynn Amalfi
as 22-1251
Plaintiff / Appellee: MADISON CAWTHORN
Appellant: BARBARA LYNN AMALFI, LAUREL ASHTON, NATALIE BARNES and others
Defendant: DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Sharma v. Circosta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: Siddhanth Sharma
Defendant: Damon Circosta, Stella Anderson, Jeff Carmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cawthorn v. CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff: Madison Cawthorn
Defendant: DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cawthorn v. Circosta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff: Madison Cawthorn
Defendant: DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Interested Party: Barbara Lynn Amalfi, Laurel Ashton, Natalie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green et al v. Bell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00493
Plaintiff: Jerry Green and Linda Petrou
Defendant: Karen Brinson Bell
Intervenor Defendant: The League of Women Voters of North Carolina and North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disability Rights NC v. North Carolina Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00361
Plaintiff: Disability Rights NC
Defendant: North Carolina Board of Elections, Jeff Carmon, III, Karen Brinson Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner et al v. Cooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00014
Defendant: Jeff Carmon, III, Stella Anderson, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff: Melissa Barbour, Lucas Miller and Beth Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?