Cases 11 - 19 of 19
HURT v. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE et al
as 2:2012cv06014
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT WEISSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SRIVASTAVA v. BAYH et al
as 1:2012cv01295
Defendant:
AFNI, INC., MARK BANNATYNE, JOHN BARTHOLOMEW and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
ROVE v. KING LINCOLN BRONZEVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2010mc00711
Respondent:
KING LINCOLN BRONZEVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, OHIO VOTER RIGHTS ALLIANCE FOR DEMOCRACY, LEAGUE OF YOUNG VOTERS/COLUMBUS and others
Petitioner:
KARL ROVE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01624
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE H. BUSH, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, DICK CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Compagno et al v. Ordoyne, et al
as 2:2008cv03973
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Compagno and Michael P. Compagno
Defendant:
Judith H Ordoyne, Clifford G Ordoyne, Paulette M Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00983
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, GEORGE H. BUSH, JENNA BUSH HAGER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shaw v. Allen et al
as 2:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Shaw
Defendant:
Meg Allen, George H Bush, Barbarh Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00206
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Bush et al
as 6:2007cv00748
Plaintiff:
Steve Cummings
Defendant:
George Bush, Jr., Richard Cheney, Dan Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
