Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Kenneth Palmer v. Robert McDonald
as 19-12165
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH PALMER
Palmer v. PLAZA SERVICES LLC et al
as 6:2019cv00223
Defendant:
PLAZA SERVICES LLC and Trans Union Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Palmer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lando v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2018cv01472
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Steven A. Claudio and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Lando, Jr. and Timothy E. Lando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Palmer v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 17-30970
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH PALMER
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Palmer v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00644
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of
Petitioner:
Kenneth Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2017cv02570
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Kenneth Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Vannoy
as 5:2016cv01076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Palmer
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Springer v. Woodward, et al
as 14-5105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD, EILEEN J. O'CONNOR, DAVID E. O'MEILIA and others
Springer v. Woodward, et al
as 14-5063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD, EILEEN J. O'CONNOR, DAVID E. O'MEILIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
