Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Jackson et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Atiba Parker
Respondent:
Kevin Jackson and Alicia Borp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Blewett, et al
as 2:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J Morgan and Kenneth J. Morgan
Defendant:
Tyler Blewett, Mark Nooth, Kevin Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Jackson et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Atiba Parker
Defendant:
Kevin Jackson and Alicia Borp
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimaal Robinson
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Abraham Campos, Kevin Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. CalArk et al
as 4:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Glen Allen Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
CalArk and Kevin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Chambers v. Village Of Oak Park et al
as 1:2022cv06008
Plaintiff:
Foster Chambers
Defendant:
Village Of Oak Park, Tammy Grossman, Kevin Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
O'Donnell v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Donnell
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Kevin Jackson, Nicholas Deranleau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
