Cases 11 - 20 of 1,280
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taubman v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-1607
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. TAUBMAN
Defendant:
DAVID SHINN, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General of State of Arizona
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kevin Michael DeHoog v. Private Quinzler Deputy et al
as 8:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Private Quinzler Deputy, Private Hernandez Deputy, Private Gonzalez Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M DeHoog v. Compton Sheriffs Train Div
as 8:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Kevin M DeHoog
Respondent:
Compton Sheriffs Train Div
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kevin M. De Hoog v. Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
as 8:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. De Hoog
Defendant:
Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. De Hoog v. Quinzler et al
as 8:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. De Hoog
Defendant:
Quinzler, Mungua, Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Sorbello v. Agco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Sorbello
Defendant:
Agco Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
