Cases 1 - 10 of 1,275
Prout v. Costco
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Prout
Defendant:
Costco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Assad v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
Scott W.H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Comptons Sheriffs Dep. Train Div.
as 8:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. DeHoog
Defendant:
Comptons Sheriffs Dep. Train Div.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Compton Sheriffs Train Division Body Cameras
as 8:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Compton Sheriffs Train Division Body Cameras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taubman v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-1607
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. TAUBMAN
Defendant:
DAVID SHINN, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General of State of Arizona
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kevin Michael DeHoog v. Private Quinzler Deputy et al
as 8:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Private Quinzler Deputy, Private Hernandez Deputy, Private Gonzalez Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
