Cases 11 - 20 of 115
CARR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99674
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donoghue v. Newcombe et al
as 1:2020cv02736
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mark Lilly, President Jimmy Carter Library and others
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Donoghue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Korey Aarstad, et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 20-35805
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT A. ALBERT, JOEL B. HEFTY, KENNETH L. DRAKE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and JOHN SWING
Graff #226507 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01630
Defendant:
Unknown DeGuilio, Unknown Pewgless, Unknown Guevarra and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Graff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. English et al
as 5:2020cv03190
Defendant:
W. J. Morris, Earl Leroy Yeakel, III, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv00260
Plaintiff:
Kenton L Carr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Borquez #031726 v. Centurion et al
as 2:2020cv01075
Defendant:
Centurion, Connie Hawley and L Carr
Plaintiff:
Armando Z Borquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Adarus Black
as 20-1173
Defendant / Appellant:
ADARUS MAZIO BLACK, aka Mark Andrea Gillery, Jr., aka Shamario Lamont Kidd, aka Shamario L. Carr
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Aguilar et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael Coffaro, Daniel Buck, Katherine Pearson and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Hooks et al
as 1:2019cv07275
Plaintiff:
Jacquetta L. Carr
Defendant:
Mary Ernesti, Adrienne Cervantes, Sheila Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
