Cases 11 - 20 of 645
Roy Derksen v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 23-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY C. DERKSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, FOND DU LAC COUNTY, WISCONSIN, TONY EVERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Laddarion Johnson v. David Zook
as 23-7013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LADDARION JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ZOOK, Warden, ROBERT WHITT, Asst. Warden, A. J. GREEN, SGT/Hearing Officer and others
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
DARREYL L WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
SADE L. WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker-Druzbick et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02837
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Walker-Druzbick and John Druzbick
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Vazquez et al
as 3:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Stevon L. Walker
Defendant:
W. Vazquez, G. Davis, Cantell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Gorbea
as 3:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
Stevon L. Walker
Defendant:
Pedro Gorbea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. BMW MC Short-Term Disability Plan, et al
as 8:2023cv04101
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Walker
Defendant:
Group Medical, Prescription Drug, Dental & Vision Plan for Associates of BMW Manufacturing Co LLC, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and BMW MC Short-Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Walker et al v. Morris
as 1:2023cv03591
Plaintiff:
James L. Walker, Jr. and J. Walker & Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Crystal N. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
