Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00109
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
American Panel Corporation v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00252
Plaintiff:
American Panel Corporation
Defendant:
L3 Technologies, Inc. and L3 Aviation Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gross v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Christopher E. Kubasik, Lewis Kramer, Vincent Pagano, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gross
Kent v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Christopher E. Kubasik, Lewis Kramer, Vincent Pagano, Jr. and others
Raul v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Christopher E. Kubasik, Ann E. Dunwoody, Lewis Kramer and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Stein v. L3 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12007
Defendant:
Christopher E. Kubasik, Lloyd W. "Fig&qu Newton, Lewis Kramer and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2018cv00582
Plaintiff:
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Defendant:
TDY Industries, LLC , L3 Technologies, LLC and United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
L3 Technologies, Inc. v. EME Technology International, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02287
Defendant:
EME Technology International, Inc., John and Jane Does Nos. 1-10, Robert Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
L3 Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
