Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017at00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00170
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kyncy v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017at00243
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Kyncy
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Jorge Luis Romero and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Kyncy v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Kyncy
Defendant:
The United States of America and Jorge Luis Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Romero-Urias v. USA
as 2:2017cv00341
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Romero-Urias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Candido Romero
as 16-17709
Petitioner:
In re: CANDIDO LUIS ROMERO
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Murphy v. LaJaunie
as 16-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ethan Murphy, Stephanie Castillo, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Christopher L. Scott, on behalf of themselves and others similiarly situated and others
Defendant:
La Boucherie Inc., 15 John Corp., LHLM Group, Corporation, AKA Brasserie Les Halles New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Philippe LaJaunie
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Romero-Rosado et al
as 3:2016cv01987
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Angel Luis Romero-Rosado, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Romero-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
