Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Frederick et al v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2018cv01077
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Frederick and Diane H. Frederick
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Services , Kathy Bradley , Shelly J. Nicewarner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick et al v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Frederick and Diane H. Frederick
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Services, Kathy Bradley, Shelly J. Nicewarner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Lupu v. Loan City LLC
as 17-2024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADRIAN LUPU
Defendant - Appellee:
LOAN CITY LLC
Third Party - Appellee:
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO
Third Party - Appellant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING
Adrian Lupu v. Loan City LLC
as 17-1944
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADRIAN LUPU
Defendant - Appellee:
LOAN CITY LLC
Third Party - Appellant:
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO
Third Party - Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC v. LUPU et al
as 2:2017cv01270
Plaintiff:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Defendant:
ADRIAN LUPU , RODICA STEFAN and RADU STEFAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv24615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Gheorghe Lupu
as 15-14687
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GHEORGHE ANDRIAN LUPU
Lupu v. Freight Handlers, Inc.
as 4:2015cv12557
Plaintiff:
Steven Lupu
Defendant:
Freight Handlers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catalin Lupu v. U.S. Attorney General
as 15-11514
Petitioner:
CATALIN AIONESEI LUPU
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lupu v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv21230
Plaintiff:
Gheorghe Adrian Lupu
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
