Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015oe00627
Plaintiff: Lewis Bernard Williams, Jr.
Defendant: Tara Dunn and XCentric Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Reynolds
as 5:2015cv03662
Petitioner: Lewis D Williams
Respondent: Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv15299
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lewis F. Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Michael Watkins, et al v. Kajima International, Inc., et al
as 10-6289
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL W. WATKINS and MICHAEL D. WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee: KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL, INC., HIROAKI HOSHINO, CEO of U. S. Operations for Kajima Corporation, RONALD M. GEORGE, individually and in his offiicial capacity as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, City of Sacramento, California and others
In re: Lewis William
as 10-12040
Petitioner: In re: LEWIS PAUL WILLIAMS
: SERVICE
Gary Williams v. Lisa Sadler, et al
as 10-3288
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: LISA L. SADLER, MARK J. WODARCYK and LEWIS E. WILLIAMS, JR.
WILLIAMS v. SEABOARD COSTLINE RAILROAD et al
as 2:2009cv92655
Plaintiff: LEWIS G. WILLIAMS
Defendant: SEABOARD COSTLINE RAILROAD, ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD and GEORGIA AND FLORIDA RAILROAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Williams v. Sadler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01068
Plaintiff: Gary L Williams
Defendant: Lisa Sadler, Lewis E Williams and Mark J Wodarcyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Lewis G. Williams v. Fibreboard Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91607
Plaintiff: Lewis G. Williams
Defendant: Fibreboard Corporation
Lewis C. Williams v. A.o. Smith, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-79192
Defendant: A.o. Smith
Plaintiff: Lewis C. Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?