Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Jason Estrada Serna v. COVID 19 et al
as 8:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jason Estrada Serna
Defendant:
COVID 19, California Republic and Homeland Security Lifelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01739
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Weingarten et al v. LifeLock Incorporated
as 2:2018cv01013
Plaintiff:
Joe Weingarten and Darrell Hunter
Defendant:
LifeLock Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oklahoma Police Pension and Re, et al v. Lifelock, Inc., et al
as 17-16895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFELOCK, INC., TODD DAVIS, CHRIS G. POWER, FKA Chris Power and others
Perez v. New York Hospital Cornell
as 17-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Perez
Defendant - Appellee:
New York Hospital Cornell, Dr. Emie, DARE, its officers and Board Members and others
Mawby v. LifeLock, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Sharel Mawby
Defendant:
LifeLock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parshall v. LifeLock Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04434
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
LifeLock Incorporated, Roy A Guthrie, Hilary A Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Napoleon Ebarle, et al v. Lifelock, Inc.
as 16-16907
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAPOLEON EBARLE, JEANNE STAMM, BRIAN LITTON and others
Objector - Appellant:
BARBARA COCHRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFELOCK, INC.
Napoleon Ebarle, et al v. Lifelock, Inc.
as 16-16908
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAPOLEON EBARLE, JEANNE STAMM, BRIAN LITTON and others
Objector - Appellant:
TERI NIEMEYER
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFELOCK, INC.
Napoleon Ebarle, et al v. Lifelock, Inc.
as 16-16881
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAPOLEON EBARLE, JEANNE STAMM, BRIAN LITTON and others
Objector - Appellant:
MARLA MERHAB ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFELOCK, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
