Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv05637
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Olin Corporation v. Insurance Company of North Ame
as 18-1655
Plaintiff - Appellee: Olin Corporation
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London and London Market Insurance Companies, The Hanover Insurance Company, as successor to Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellant: Lamorak Insurance Company, FKA OneBeacon America Insurance Company
Olin Corporation v. Insurance Company of North Ame
as 18-1532
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Olin Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London and London Market Insurance Companies
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Lamorak Insurance Company, FKA OneBeacon America Insurance Company
Defendant: The Hanover Insurance Company, as successor to Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, American Re-Insurance Company and others
Continental Casualty Company et al v. Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00186
Plaintiff: Certain London Market Insurance Companies , Accident & Casualty Co. , Accident & Casualty Company of Winterthur (No. 2 A/C) and others
Defendant: Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
In re Debtor Lakeland Development Company
as 2:2018cv01084
Cross Defendant: Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, Employers Surplus Lines Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and others
ThirdParty Defendant: Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Goodman Santa Fe Springs SPE LLC and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Counter Claimant: Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cross Claimant: Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
In Re Debtor: Lakeland Development Company
Counter Defendant: Jason M. Rund
Plaintiff: Jason M. Rund
In Re Debtor: Lakeland Development Company
as 2:2018cv00937
Plaintiff: Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
In Re Debtor: Lakeland Development Company
Defendant: Jason M. Rund
In Re Debtor: Lakeland Development Company
as 2:2018mc00019
Plaintiff: Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
In Re Debtor: Lakeland Development Company
Defendant: Jason M. Rund
Foresight Energy, LLC v. Certain London Market Insurance Companies et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv02266
Defendant: Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Ironshore Insurance LTD, Allied World Assurance Company, LTD and others
Plaintiff: Foresight Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Type: Contract Insurance
Continental Casualty Company et al v. Hopeman Brothers, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00688
Plaintiff: Continental Casualty Company, Lexington Insurance Company, Certain London Market Insurance Companies and others
Defendant: Hopeman Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Joseph Robertson, et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al
as 17-90001
Plaintiff - Petitioner: JOSEPH ROBERTSON, LARRY HANKTON, SHARVONNE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Respondent: CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, individually and as the successor corporation of Gulf Oil Exploration & Production, Company, BP EXPLORATION & OIL, INCORPORATED, and/or BP Products North America, Incorporated and/or Amoco Oil Company, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?