Cases 11 - 20 of 572
(HC) Lopes v. Borla
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Manuel D. Lopes
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOPES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00170
Petitioner:
FRANK LOPES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Bird v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Keith Paul Bird
Defendant:
Julie Williams, Rayford, Lopes and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jozadaque Rodrigues da Silva, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10517
Petitioner:
JOZADAQUE RODRIGUES DA SILVA, SIMONE LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA, JULIA RHAYALLA LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morra v. Crawford et al
as 6:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William J. Morra, Jr.
Defendant:
Darren S Crawford, Robert Brown, Monique Haughton Worrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopes v. Bynum
as 5:2024ct03027
Plaintiff:
Rosivelte Lopes
Defendant:
Lt. Victoria Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopes v. Melecio
as 9:2023cv01550
Petitioner:
Sean Lopes
Respondent:
Paul Melecio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopes Casiano v. Garland
as 24-513
Petitioner:
DALTON JUNIOR LOPES CASIANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
The VR School et al v. California Department of Education et al
as 3:2023cv06286
Petitioner:
The VR School and Dr. Freedom Cheteni
Respondent:
California Department of Education, Malia Vella and Carrie Lopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
