Cases 11 - 20 of 805
(HC) Torrez v. Lundy
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
Julio Angel Torrez, Jr.
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Lundie v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Nicole Lundie
Defendant:
William Roberts, II
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lundie v. Obama
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Nicole Lundie
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lundy v. O'Malley
as 24-1245
Plaintiff:
T. L. and TAI-NAJAH LUNDY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Jesse Allen Morrison v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv01850
Petitioner:
Jesse Allen Morrison
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaitlin Louise Lundy v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Louise Lundy
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frederick George Roehler v. L. Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Frederick George Roehler, II
Defendant:
L. Lundy, D. Williams, S. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Fields v. Lundy
as 2:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Darren Fields
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baxter v. Burton et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Destiny Baxter
Defendant:
Tonya Burton, Christopher Rakes, Anthony W. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
